In
ancient Rome, during triumphal marches through city, a slave always
rode on the chariot carrying the conquering hero. His job was to hold a
laurel wreath over the hero’s head while whispering “Remember,
thou art but a man.” Wise people, those Romans.
Every
human being—I’m sure this was true even of Roman generals—is a
mixture of ego and insecurities: they are part of what makes us
human. It is the varying percentages of each which helps make each of
us who we are and sets us apart from everyone else. I’m not sure
what the ideal percentage of each might be, but suspect that most of
us fall somewhere around 10 points to either side of the 50 percent
center line, with some natural degree of fluctuation between them.
Ego and insecurity are a little like oil and vinegar in a cruet, each
clearly defined.
I
truly admire people with healthy egos, and have noticed that those
who have them seldom seem aware of it. But then, that’s the point
of a healthy ego: there is no need to question it. And while people
who project too strong an ego can be insufferable, it’s been my
experience that obnoxious egos are often chimeras, and those who
display them often are doing so to hide their insecurities.
But
in some people, writers among them, it’s as though someone were
shaking the bejezus out of the cruet and the ego and insecurity are
so jumbled as to be indistinguishable. I know whereof I speak,
because my ego and insecurity have been in the process of
emulsification in the cruet of my mind for as long as I can
remember. My ego tells me I’m great, and that anyone who reads my
words will automatically become devoted and adoring fans. My
insecurity tells my ego it’s full of crap, and I’m no damned good
(on a bad day) or mediocre at best (on a good day) and that anyone
who tells me I do have some worth are just being kind.
A
writer’s ego is large enough to assume people will want to read
what they have written, and often unjustifiably insecure in fearing
they won’t. I am frequently awed by the extremes of both my ego and
my insecurities and frustrated by the fact that they invariable
negate one another. It is my ego which writes these blogs, and my
insecurities that constantly scoff at how I can have the temerity to
think that anyone could actually care what I have to say.
For
whatever reason, many writers—and you don’t need a caliper and
slide rule to figure out I’m including myself here—have a
desperate need for approval, which is a form of validation. Every
human needs validation, but writers…I…seem for whatever reason to
be particularly needy. There is never enough love; never enough
approval, and a perverse willingness to find and magnify faults and
flaws. I fully realize I’m an emotional sponge, eager to soak up
every drop of approval I can get. And when I don’t get enough—which
of course I never possibly can—I chalk it up to my unworthiness and
figuratively beat myself severely about the head and shoulders for
it.
But
underneath it all, or perhaps because of it, I am truly convinced
(ego) that I am not alone in the way I feel; that you may sometimes
feel the same way, and that through my throwing myself out in front
of you, you might see that you are not as alone as you may think. It
is pure ego for me to assume so, but would be nice if it were true. I
think they call it “validation.”
Dorien's
blogs are posted by 10 a.m. Central time every Monday, Wednesday, and
Friday. Please take a moment to visit his website
(http://www.doriengrey.com)
and, if you enjoy these blogs, you might want to check out Short
Circuits: a Life in Blogs (http://bit.ly/m8CSO1).
2 comments:
There's a story in this, D. It's rich for use in a plot. Can a detective or amateur detective be hired to look for validation? It's an intriguing concept...
Hmm. I can see it now: "Mr. Hardesty, someone has stolen my validation, and I want it back!"
Post a Comment