It
sometimes seems I spend more time in these blogs dwelling in the past
than in the present, but then the more past one has, the more there
is to talk about.
Memory
is a trompe l’oeil painting of the past, done by the mind.
The result may seem totally lifelike, but in fact it is not. The
mind's inner artist takes small liberties, lightening the background
here, touching up an area there, sometimes using heavier or darker
hues than the actuality warrants. We display these canvases proudly
to ourselves, and are certain that they are reality recaptured, when
in fact they are not.
My
brief and checkered Navy experience, oddly, provided me with several
of my most treasured and vivid trompes l’oeil paintings,
many of which I have shared in earlier blogs. Perhaps they stand out
because my military “career” was so totally different from any of
my other life experiences, and because they are all backed up by
“certificates of authenticity” in the form of letters written at
the exact time (or within days) of the events portrayed. But my two
of the most outstanding hang in honored places along the walls of my
mind. The first while I was learning to fly as a Naval Aviation
Cadet, which has something of a “certificate of authenticity” in
the form of a letter to my parents.
The
skies over and within 50 miles of the Pensacola Naval Air Station
were normally aswarm with pilots-in-training, like fruit flies around
a bowl of ripe bananas. But on one solo flight, I found myself
totally alone in a huge “valley” surrounded by mountains of
whipped-cream cumulus clouds. Just me, looping and spinning and
soaring between the clouds, looking down at the green quilt of the
earth below. I’ve seldom had such a sense of pure joy. But my vivid
memory of that day does not match exactly with the way I described it
in my letter, written immediately after the event. Subtle
differences, but different enough so that I notice them and am
troubled by them.
The
second of these specific memories is of the week before the Ti
(USS Ticonderoga) headed for home after eight months in the
Mediterranean, anchored off Cannes, France. It, too, is detailed in
my navy letters and adds verisimilitude to the memory: days and
evenings spent diving and swimming off an old quay—which I actually
re-found after 55 years—with two French and two German young men,
dinners at a tiny restaurant found totally by accident high in the
hills above the city, walking down the twisting streets late at night
singing old WWII songs, seeing the lights of the ships (including the
fabled ocean liner, Ile de France) in the harbor below. My
chest aches, remembering and wanting to be there/then now. But again,
the picture in my mind is subtly different than the truth in the
letters.
But
like the painting of Dorian Gray
in Oscar Wilde's novel, there are also trompes l'oiel best
avoided, and we all have many of them, stacked against the wall in
some dark, cobwebbed place.
My
main problem with memory, other than its tendency to reposition the
elements of whatever picture is being recalled, is that it tends to
be too strongly tied in with emotion, though there is one vivid
memory painting that oddly evokes absolutely no emotional response.
And that is of my seven-week stay at Mayo Clinic during my treatment
for tongue cancer in 2003. I can picture quite vividly the daily
routine: my large, comfortable room at Hope Lodge, provided free by
the American Cancer Society, the fact that it did not have a TV set
(how ungrateful of me even to think that!)—a deliberate decision on
their part, I think, to encourage residents to get out of their rooms
and mingle with others—the five-times-a-week two block walk to
Radiation Oncology for 25-minute radiation treatments (35 in all);
the decision to request a stomach feeding tube when trying to swallow
became simply too difficult. I look back on all of it with a very
strange detachment and no recognizable emotion at all.
Even
the most pleasant of memories are tainted by a tangible sense of loss
and longing, and often the more precious the picture, the more acute
those senses are. I can’t just enjoy memories of things and people
past, I cannot acknowledge that they are not real, and I must reach
out to them. And each time I try, the realization that, real as they
are to me, I cannot touch them, cannot relive them, cannot be at that
time and in that place, fills me with sadness. And my memory's trompe
l'oeil (literally “deceive the
eye”) for me becomes trompe l'coeur and
deceives my heart.
Dorien's
blogs are posted by 10 a.m. Central time every Monday, Wednesday, and
Friday. Please take a moment to visit his website
(http://www.doriengrey.com)
and, if you enjoy these blogs, you might want to check out Short
Circuits: a Life in Blogs (http://bit.ly/m8CSO1).
2 comments:
Lovingly poetic, D. Ironically, as you return to posts like these, I return to the idea of using something like this as a strength in your writing. You have such rich, vivid memories (even if they are varied versions of the real thing) that I still say they should be used in a book.
The place where you met the four men that you revisited... Wouldn't it be something if, in a story, the main character goes back on that journey just like you did and on that day all four of you were drawn to the same spot again. There are so many places to take a tale like that. So many of your memories of the military you could vividly paint and then create a tale with.
How beautiful a place in print those memories would find a home for so many to share. And that's one of the many gifts a memory offers; they should be shared in one way or another, the bigger the better.
Just a thought because you, as always, inspire me to think much bigger than I typically do.
Thanks, Kage! My mind is a well from which I regularly draw material for my books, but your note sparked, for the first time in years, the idea for a short story. We shall see.
Thanks again,
D
Post a Comment