Just thinking this morning
about the similarities between authors and architects. Both put a lot
more time, effort, and detail into their work than is ever evident in
the finished product. An architect designs a building, and the people
who visit and live and work in it never give an instant's thought to
all the details that went into creating it—the planning, layout,
materials, framing, plumbing, lighting and electrical work.
The same is true of books.
There's so much that goes into the components of every book's plot,
setting, characters, mood, and tone that the reader is never
conscious of. Each book is the like the architect's design of a
single structure, and the writers of series are like the architects
of subdivisions. Series have special problems to contend with not
generally found in “stand-alone” books, and which are seldom if
ever apparent to or considered by the reader.
I write two mystery
series—the Dick Hardesty mysteries, and the Elliott Smith
paranormal mystery series. I'm fourteen books into the Dick Hardesty
series, and the awaiting the release of the fourth Elliott Smith
mystery. Each book of a series must stand on its own, so as not to
totally confuse a reader who may step into the series with the most
recent book, or anywhere between the first and most recent.
Therefore, while regular followers of the series already know who the
main—and many of the secondary—characters are, each book in the
series must reintroduce everyone in some way for the sake of the
first-time reader.
With a stand-alone book—that
is, one not a part of a series—the primary and secondary characters
and settings are simply accepted as part of the background. In a
series, however, recurring characters—and especially settings—take
on a special significance and must be consistent from book to book.
Keeping track of them is essential, and can be confusing for the
writer.
The Dick Hardesty series is
set in a city which does not exist in any map, but with which the
regular reader has become familiar by seeing them reappear in book
after book. The recurring characters, appearing in nearly every book,
take on lives of their own for the regular reader, and become like
old friends with each reappearance. I have deliberately never given a
physical description of Dick, leaving that to the reader's
imagination, and I've been delighted over the years to have notes
from readers describing him to me.
The Elliott Smith series is
set in modern-day Chicago, which makes the entire setting issue
easier. But I still have to be careful lest a reader catch me up in a
geographical or chronological error.
Perhaps the major difference
between architects and authors—at least this author—is that while
the thoughts begin in the mind, the intricate details of a building
must be set down in blueprints before the actual construction begins.
Admittedly, some writers do the same thing with their manuscripts,
but I do not simply because, for me, writing is fluid and the plot
and characters often send me off in directions I'd not anticipated
when I began. To know, as I wrote from detailed notes, exactly what
was coming next would take the spontaneity, and much of the fun, out
of the process. I truly enjoy “reading” my books as I write them.
And this, of course, compounds all the inherent problems. I find
myself spending a great deal of time going back in the manuscript to
add details, clues, sometimes introduce a new character, and/or make
small—and sometimes major—changes to accommodate new thoughts
that pop up during the writing process. The trick is to do it in such
a way that the reader won't even be aware of the changes made. Not to
do so would be equivalent to an architect having doors open onto
brick walls.
Were I an architect, I'd not
be a I.M. Pei or a Frank Gehry or a Louis Sullivan. I am not a writer
of “literature.” I leave literary skyscrapers and monumental
structures to more accomplished writers, though I like to think that
all my books have some meaningful flourishes/elements of social
relevance...I've written of vengeance and vigilantism, alcoholism and
AIDS, bisexuality and the afterlife, plagiarism and greed. But
overall, I prefer to write the equivalent of small, comfortable
cottages in which I hope the reader will feel at home. And I'm happy
with that.
Dorien's
blogs are posted by 10 a.m. Central time every Monday, Wednesday, and
Friday. Please take a moment to check out his website
(http://www.doriengrey.com)
and, if you enjoy these blogs, you might want to check out Short
Circuits: a Life in Blogs (http://bit.ly/m8CSO1 ).
4 comments:
Since I have both designed a home of my own and written a book, (I'[m working on my second book) I can totally relate to this blog.
Wow, Donna...a woman of many talents! Good luck with your writing! (And thanks for taking the time to post a comment.)
Having been to Chicago a number of times, I love that you put local locations in the Elliott Smith mysteries. It takes me right there and your attention to detail through the characters is precisely what sets it apart from other novels I read.
Thanks, Kage. The problem with having the setting of a real city is that if you make up a building or a business in a certain area, there are people who know the area might say "that's not right!" This doesn't happen with the Dick Hardesty series, where no one can challenge it.
Post a Comment