When I was a kid, during
WWII, I could never figure out how any country could declare itself
neutral; no one can be neutral in a fight if someone is determined to
beat the crap out of you unless you're willing to have the
crap beat out of you. Even Gandhi wasn't neutral in his ideals—he
just didn't believe in fighting back. I know now that Sweden and
Switzerland remained neutral only because it was in the combatants'
best interests to let them remain neutral.
On a personal level, few of
us are neutral on very many issues; the closer they come to our
personal interests, the less neutral we become. Yet I remain neutral
to many of the things to which others are not. I apply the “how
much does it affect me, personally,” rule. My tendency is to be
neutral to 99.9 percent of my fellow humans, to like almost everyone
with whom I have contact unless and until I am given good reason not
to, and to actively dislike very few. I can in fact honestly say I
have actively hated two people I have known personally (and, on
thinking of them after 30+ years, still do).
I think it's fairly safe to
say I go through life largely in a state of neutral when it comes to
most of what goes on around me. Since no one but me pays my rent or
has the ability to disrupt my day-to-day life, I see little point in
letting what other people do or say have too much influence over me.
This is not to say I am not interested in others and their lives, but
I by and large give them credit for being able to live their lives
without interference or guidance from me. (Not that I do not give out
excellent advice when asked, of course.) I do not see much point in
engaging in discussions of the flaws and foibles of others.
The ability to see both
sides of any given issue—or to realize that nothing is all black or
all white—clearly lends itself to neutrality. So much that goes on
in the world is totally beyond my control I find it better, though
not always easy, to ignore them. There are, of course, things and
people—mostly politicians, bigots, and those utterly devoid of
scruples and morals—which spark intensely negative emotions within
me. I do not like those feelings and am not proud of them, but must
acknowledge them. And having so said, I find it interesting to
realize that I do not apply those emotions to anyone I know
personally—probably because the minute I begin to sense a negative
reaction to someone, I simply do not associate with them.
If emotions can be described
as colors, neutrality is unquestionably a soft grey. And while it may
not nearly as intense as the flame red of anger or the ice-blue of
outright rejection, it provides a level of comfort that intensity
does not. The danger in always choosing grey over the more intense
colors is that I suspect that limbo is grey.
My mind seems to have only
two gears—out-of-control speed and neutral. Either my thoughts are
racing so fast it's nearly impossible to catch and hold on to any one
of them, or they just sit there in the Lotus position, refusing to
respond to any stimulus. This is particularly true when I really need
to think of something—like the subject for my next blog.
I believe that time is a
major factor in neutrality—experiencing something for the first
time tends to produce the strongest emotion, and the more often one
encounters or experiences the same thing, the more commonplace—the
more grey—it becomes. It sometimes bothers me that I have become
neutral to so many thing I once found exciting, though it is, I
believe, a general human condition. The older one gets, the fewer
things one encounters for the first time. How many TV shows can you
think of that you started out loving, only to have that initial
enthusiasm gradually wane over time. Familiarity may not breed
contempt, but it often does breed neutrality.
Dorien's
blogs are posted by 10 a.m. Central time every Monday and Thursday.
Please take a moment to visit his website (http://www.doriengrey.com)
and, if you enjoy these blogs, you might want to check out Short
Circuits: a Life in Blogs (http://bit.ly/m8CSO1),
which will shortly also be available as an audiobook.
3 comments:
Thought provoking as always. I've been thinking about what you said regarding hate. I know I've hated in the past, only the older I get, if I cannot forgive, then I become neutral about it and them.
By the same token, I know I have been hated, too, and quite possibly still am. That in itself might make an interesting post for me to write about one day. It's one thing to hate, but do we acknowledge that we are also the subject of someone else's hate?
Like I said, another though provoking piece, D.
Thank you sir, Most Thought Provoking as Kage said.
Looking forward to reading more of this. ♥♥♥
Mikie
Thanks, Mikie (and as always, Kage). I hope you might become a regular reader...especially now that I'm off for Rome today and a Mediterranean cruise, which I'll detail in blogs and photos.
Post a Comment